Funniest mindless movie of the last few years. McLovin is the best, and the other guys grew on me. 
In his job he needs to undervalue the suffering of others in order to make more money. Then there’s the smell, the ass and the eye. The degree of objectification of desire is in direct proportion to the self-debasement of the indulger. By degrading the other, he nullifies himself. The very indifference to the overjealous ones, the suppressed recalcitrant losers of the world, is what causes their victims to exist. Great disturbing movie.
A lost science fiction PBS movie with Taoist undertones is a real find, right? A guy discovers his dreams change reality—when he wakes up he finds himself in a world where the content of his dreams have actually happened. He of course gets scared after a couple of nightmares, seeks relief in drugs, and then, because of them, is lead to a psychiatrist. 
Here's for all the sissy Apple lovers out there... This is the ultimate design for my old Duron, which faithfully downloaded well over one terabyte (mostly movies, 1300+) always on 24/7/365 over the last four years. It also runs Apache and is a file and printer server, as well as a router for my home network (with four, also damn old and beautiful computers). Sometimes I dust it off with a vacuum cleaner.
I really enjoyed 
I have read the article on 
In imdb a user commented: "Annoying little transition into some sort of regurgitated independent film values finds this shallow project from Brad Silberling offering little and providing less in this embarrassingly exploitive work." I agree, yet it is still watchable — even more so if you understand how clichê is the fabricated spontaneity in it. It is as if independent movie has aquired its own hollywood-like formulaicism. So it kind of becomes an interestingly consumated aesthetic portrail of so many cult-status fabricated stylishness examples we see around. Many people liked 
2005.09.30 • 02:04 • 0 com
Khyab pa is also translated as "entails". It seems that tibetans have this idea about objects being "filled by reason" in three distinct meanings: entailment, intersection (specifically in the case of inclusion) and validity. But this may not be a simple confusion between a logic operator, a set operator and a "logic situation".
"To be a man is to be mortal" would be something like "mortality pervades man"; vowels belong to alphabets would be "alphabet pervades vowels"; and similarly they could say "'To be a man isto be mortal, Socrates is a man ∴ Socrates is mortal' pervades"1.
In formal tibetan debate, for instance, there are three possible answers to a conclusion:
1. I accept ('dod).
2. The reason is not established (rtags ma grub).
3. There is no pervasion [i.e., connection] (khyab pa ma byung).
The first one is used when the conclusion supports your own thesis. The second one means you don't accept one of the premisses, and the third one means there is no logical nexus between the propositions.
The word is also used in more religious contexts, as in "basic intelligence (rig pa)2 pervades the deluded mind (sems)3" or "buddha-nature pervades sentient beings". So it seems buddhism also has a clear connection between validity and goodness — and maybe we could extend that to the concept of infinity: "boundless light pervades emptyness".
"To be a man is to be mortal" would be something like "mortality pervades man"; vowels belong to alphabets would be "alphabet pervades vowels"; and similarly they could say "'To be a man isto be mortal, Socrates is a man ∴ Socrates is mortal' pervades"1.
In formal tibetan debate, for instance, there are three possible answers to a conclusion:
1. I accept ('dod).
2. The reason is not established (rtags ma grub).
3. There is no pervasion [i.e., connection] (khyab pa ma byung).
The first one is used when the conclusion supports your own thesis. The second one means you don't accept one of the premisses, and the third one means there is no logical nexus between the propositions.
The word is also used in more religious contexts, as in "basic intelligence (rig pa)2 pervades the deluded mind (sems)3" or "buddha-nature pervades sentient beings". So it seems buddhism also has a clear connection between validity and goodness — and maybe we could extend that to the concept of infinity: "boundless light pervades emptyness".
Shares tags with: Infinity and Validity (ethics as transcendental);
1. ^ I'm not sure if they need it to have true premisses, since validity doesn't, but when they are talking about pervasion, they mean that the nexus between the conclusion and the premisses is ok
2. ^ non-dual mind, intrinsic awareness, "logic", "philosophy", etc...
3. ^ conceptual mind, everyday mind, etc.
