There are things that are "owned" only in the sense that somebody has arrived first or had the most powerful fists. Other things are the product of careful work, many times more of an intellectual nature. In any case, it is clear to anyone that the more you own, the more you get nervous.

So the notion of property should be respected in any case where somebody feels nervous about our advances — even if it is something just like begging. This is valid in any sphere, be it mental, psychological, sociological or purely physical. For instance, some people may open the doors of their houses easily, and you can live with them for some days without disturbing or being disturbed, having meals and fun together. Others even steal the right of peace of those around, by making terrible sounds in the neighbourhood. The idea that it is licit to inflinge upon someone the lacking of what he needs or thinks he needs is preposterous.

On the other side, if their needs are of unreasonable nature — such as having more than what is needed to live a restful and spacious life (such as defined in any constitution) — then he should be encouraged to own less, distributing his goods among those he sees fit to enjoy them better. This is an encouragement both to the giver and the receiver and does not relate to communism, because it is not based on politics, but personal ethics. The encouragement is just living this way and spreading this notion with our own example, not any kind of propaganda.

In matters of purely abstract things, such as information, where nobody is deprived of the thing itself when copied, then only the right for privacy should be noted. Otherwise, if it is not deemed "personal", such as works of art could be (for an egoistical artist), nobody should be blamed for using what is useful. In fact, things as the owning of genetic programs are absolutely immoral.

Moral is a feature of thinking beings. Corporations are human constructions based on some rules, motives or principles, the main one being profit. Since a contract isn't a thinking interactive thing¹, it should never be considered a person and allowed to have rights.

The idea that corporations are made by humans and therefore should be under their control is misleading. More often the opposite happens — the corporation makes humans act forcibly to its benefit (profit) even where it can be clearly seen that this is not the best for all and even for the individual compelled by such contracts.

We are not in perfect knowledge of any teleological truth. Striving for confort, economics, information, quality of life, etc, may or not be goals for the ultimate good. Since all our efforts are based on our imperfect knowledge, true progress cannot be phantomed. Since we don't know what it is, any particular definition the word can have shouldn't be taken as necessarily desirable.

No true form of capitalism has ever existed in any state, nor should it. Capitalism should not be encouraged by governments, it should be only tolerated. The idea that accumulation of profit and competition are necessarily good and are the necessary causes for human happiness is absurd. In fact, it seems that our communication and landscape becomes a solely economic one. Consumerism, inequality, environmental issues and the decay of human relations (besides economic ones) are all intensified by striving capitalists. Corporations in particular should not be allowed.

Publicity should be heavily regulated. The only available publicity should be the one on magazines, newspapers, TV, Radio and Internet — stuff you need to voluntarily choose to consume. Outdoors, pamphlets, street-shouting, etc, should be banned. Any invasive and non-ecological form should be heavily taxated or prohibited.